__________________________________________________________________

QUANTUM CHRISTIANITY

  Quantum Christianity:  the third of the evidentiary Theoheuristic sciences which prevails upon traditional scientific understanding in a way which challenges its logic, purpose, and completion.

 The first was Theoscience, which was built upon the precepts of Newtonian science—but in a way which showed that physics was merely a description of creation which God conducted; the second was Theoretical Christianity, which demonstrated through Theoretical Physics the Einsteinian equation E = mc² in a transpositional way—as m = E/c², illustrating where the matter in the universe came from.

 Now comes the third:  Quantum Christianity, which borrows from the theories of Stephen Hawking and Quantum Mechanics, expanding on Biblical principles, doctrines, and statements which explain certain circumstances in our histories, present, and futures.  Quantum Christianity examines the PARRC-lexicon nomenclature phrases Alternities (The General Theory Of Alternity being altered eternities which co-exist side-by-side in a quantum way—and the Special Theory Of Alternity addressing the movement in time back and forth (or linear) while maintaining the former position in the same quantum existence string laterally) and Universions (The General Theory Of Universion being the possibility that the “Big Bang” has been followed by a “Big Crunch—“ and this is not the first of the universes created by God—and the Special Theory Of Universion addressing the movement in quantum existence laterally while maintaining the relative position in linear time).

 It also looks into the controversy concerning the Steady-State vs. “Big Crunch” theories of the universe; those relative proponents have been resolved into two camps similar to the Newtonian vs. Theoretical and  Exotic (Ether) Physics proponents.  Quantum Christianity offers a Theosynthesis¹ of Theofusion² which allows for the peaceful and synergistic coexistence of both cosmological theories—in a way which only the Bible through our analysis of Theoretical Christianity can provide.

 First, explanations of quantum mechanics and the referents:  ALTERNITIES:

 ___________________________________________________________________________________

 QUANTUM MECHANICS:

 Within a few years, roughly between 1924 and 1930, an entirely new theoretical approach to dynamics was developed to account for subatomic behavior. Named quantum mechanics or wave mechanics, it started with the suggestion in 1923 by the French physicist Louis Victor, Prince de Broglie, that not only electromagnetic radiation but matter could also have wave as well as particle aspects. The wavelength of the so-called matter waves associated with a particle is given by the equation λ = h/mv, where m is the particle mass and v its velocity. Matter waves were conceived of as pilot waves guiding the particle motion, a property that should result in diffraction under suitable conditions. This was confirmed in 1927 by the experiments on electron-crystal interactions by the American physicists Clinton Joseph Davisson and Lester Halbert Germer and the British physicist George Paget Thomson. Subsequently, Werner Heisenberg, Max Born, and Ernst Pascual Jordan of Germany and the Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger developed Broglie's idea into a mathematical form capable of dealing with a number of physical phenomena and with problems that could not be handled by classical physics. In addition to confirming Bohr's postulate regarding the quantization of energy levels in atoms, quantum mechanics now provides an understanding of the most complex atoms, and has also been a guiding spirit in nuclear physics. Although quantum mechanics is usually needed only on the microscopic level (with Newtonian mechanics still satisfactory for macroscopic systems), certain macroscopic effects, such as the properties of crystalline solids, also exist that can only be satisfactorily explained by principles of quantum mechanics.

 Going beyond Broglie's notion of the wave-particle duality of matter, additional important concepts have since been incorporated into the quantum-mechanical picture. These include the discovery that electrons must have some permanent magnetism and, with it, an intrinsic angular momentum, or spin, as a fundamental property. Spin was subsequently found in almost all other elementary particles. In 1925 the Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli expounded the exclusion principle, which states that in an atom no two electrons can have precisely the same set of quantum numbers. Four quantum numbers are needed to specify completely the state of an electron in an atom. The exclusion principle is vital for an understanding of the structure of the elements and of the periodic table. Heisenberg in 1927 put forth the uncertainty principle, which asserted the existence of a natural limit to the precision with which certain pairs of physical quantities can be known simultaneously.

 Finally, a synthesis of quantum mechanics and relativity was made in 1928 by the British mathematical physicist Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac, leading to the prediction of the existence of the positron and bringing the development of quantum mechanics to a culmination.

 Largely as a result of Bohr's ideas, a different and statistical approach developed in modern physics. The fully deterministic cause-effect relations produced by Newtonian mechanics were supplanted by predictions of future events in terms of statistical probability only. Thus, the wave property of matter also implies that, in accordance with the uncertainty principle, the motion of the particles can never be predicted with absolute certainty even if the forces are known completely. Although this statistical aspect plays no detectable role in macroscopic motions, it is dominant on the molecular, atomic, and subatomic scale.

 (© 1993-2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.)

 ___________________________________________________________________________________

 STEPHEN HAWKING:

 Hawking, Stephen William (1942- ), British theoretical physicist and mathematician whose main field of research has been the nature of space and time, including irregularities in space and time known as singularities. Hawking has also devoted much of his life to making his theories accessible to the public through lectures, books, and films.

 Hawking was born in Oxford, England, and he showed exceptional talent in mathematics and physics from an early age. He entered Oxford University in 1958 and became especially interested in thermodynamics (the study of the interaction of matter and energy), relativity theory, and quantum mechanics (see Quantum Theory). In 1961 he attended a summer course at the Royal Observatory that encouraged these interests. He completed his undergraduate courses in 1962 and received a bachelor’s degree in physics. Hawking then enrolled as a research student in general relativity at the department of applied mathematics and theoretical physics at the University of Cambridge.

 Hawking earned his Ph.D. degree from Trinity College at the University of Cambridge in 1966. He stayed at the University of Cambridge, doing post-doctoral research, until he became a professor of physics in 1977. He became one of the youngest fellows of the Royal Society in 1974. In 1979 he was appointed Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at Cambridge.

 During his postgraduate program, Hawking was diagnosed as having Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), a rare progressive disease that handicaps movement and speech. This disease makes it necessary for Hawking to carry out the long and complex mathematical calculations that his work requires in his head. He has been able to continue his studies and to embark upon a distinguished and productive scientific career despite his illness.

 From its earliest stages, Hawking’s research has been concerned with the concept of singularities—breakdowns in space and time where the classic laws of physics no longer apply. The combination of time and three-dimensional space is called space-time. The most familiar example of a singularity is a black hole, the final form of a collapsed star. Much of what scientists believe about space-time comes from the theory of relativity, which was developed in the early 20th century by German American physicist Albert Einstein. During the late 1960s Hawking proved that if the general theory of relativity is correct, then a singularity must also have occurred at the big bang. The big bang is the explosion that marked the beginning of the universe and the birth of space-time itself.

 In 1970 Hawking’s research turned to the examination of the properties of black holes. The boundary of a black hole is called the event horizon. Hawking realized that the surface area of the event horizon around a black hole could only increase or remain constant with time—this area could never decrease. This meant, for example, that if two black holes merge, the surface area of the new black hole would be larger than the sum of the surface areas of the two original black holes. He also noticed that there were certain parallels between the laws of thermodynamics and the properties of black holes. For instance, the second law of thermodynamics states that entropy, or disorder, must increase with time. The surface area of the event horizon of a black hole is therefore similar to the entropy of a thermodynamic system.

 From 1970 to 1974, Hawking and his associates provided mathematical proof for the hypothesis formulated by American physicist John Wheeler known as the “No Hair Theorem.” This theorem states that the only properties that particles of matter keep once they enter a black hole are mass, angular momentum (or spin), and electric charge. Matter entering a black hole loses its shape, its chemical composition, and its distinction as matter or antimatter.

 Since 1974 Hawking has studied the behavior of matter in the immediate vicinity of a black hole from a theoretical basis in quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is a theory that describes how subatomic particles behave and how matter and radiation interact. He found, to his initial surprise, that black holes—from which nothing was supposed to be able to escape—could emit thermal radiation, or heat. Several explanations for this phenomenon were proposed, including one involving the creation of virtual particles. A virtual particle differs from a real particle in that a virtual particle cannot be seen by means of a particle detector, but it can be observed through its indirect effects. Empty space is full of virtual particles fleetingly “created” out of nothing, forming a particle and antiparticle pair that immediately destroy each other. (This concept is a violation of the principle of conservation of mass and energy, which says that the combined amount of mass and energy in a system must stay the same. The concept is permitted—and predicted—by the uncertainty principle of German physicist Werner Heisenberg, which states that it is impossible to measure both the position and energy of a particle precisely. Hawking proposed that when a particle pair is created near a black hole, one half of the pair might disappear into the black hole, leaving the other half to radiate away from the black hole. To a distant observer, the radiation of the leftover particle would appear as thermal radiation.

 Throughout the 1990s Hawking sought to produce a theory that could connect several theories used by scientists to explain the universe. This theory would combine quantum mechanics and relativity to form a quantum theory of gravity (see Unified Field Theory). Such a unified physical theory would incorporate all four basic types of interactions between matter and energy: strong nuclear interactions, weak nuclear interactions, electromagnetic interactions, and gravitational interactions.

 The properties of space-time, the beginning of the universe, and a unified theory of physics are all fundamental research areas of science. Hawking has made, and continues to make, major contributions to the modern understanding of all these areas. He has also made his work accessible to the public through several books, including A Brief History of Time (1988) and Black Holes and Baby Universes and Other Essays (1993), which are suitable for a general audience. In 1992 American filmmaker Errol Morris helped make A Brief History of Time into a film about Hawking’s life and work.

 (© 1993-2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.)

 ___________________________________________________________________________________

 QUANTUM EXISTENCE THROUGH PARTICIPATION AND OBSERVATION:

 The quantum, strangest feature of this strange universe, cracks the armor that conceals the secret of existence. In contrast to the view that the universe is a machine governed by some magic equation, we explore here the view that the world is a self-synthesizing system of existences, built on observer-participancy via a network of elementary quantum phenomena. The elementary quantum phenomenon in the sense of Bohr, the elementary act of observer-participancy, develops definiteness out of indeterminism, secures a communicable reply in response to a well-defined question. The rate of carrying out such yes-no determinations, and their accumulated number, are both minuscule today when compared to the rate and number to be anticipated in the billions of years yet to come. The coming explosion of life opens the door, however, to an all-encompassing role for observer-participancy: to build, in time to come, no minor part of what we call its past—our past, present, and future—but this whole vast world.

 (J.A. Wheeler, “Basics Concepts In Quantum And Stochastic Theory,” IBM Journal Of Research And Development, Volume 32, Number 1, Page 4, 1988)

 ___________________________________________________________________________________

 FROM “THE PHILOSOPHICAL EXPERIMENT:”

An increasingly deeper insight into the realm of elementary particle physics might disclose increasingly queer situations, for in a way we are approaching the coordinate of the orthoexistence. The transition from classical mechanics to quantum mechanics and most likely further to a more involved "mechanics", which is expected to be grounded on informational principles, may be regarded as an illustration of this idea.

By virtue of the orthoexistence hypothesis, orthoexistence is a coordinate of the world. Additionally, under the same hypothesis, a specific phenomenality of material nature is introduced along this coordinate.

Hosts, even an infinity, of universe-existences might emerge from orthoexistence. Let us now assume that only one existence with started-ups and stop-overs were born. We have seen that the stop-over "time" (Fig. 51) are meaningless. Each universe-existence in the "succession" of such existences may be governed by certain laws, and so different universe-existences are governed by different laws. The diversity of the world would then become apparent both within an universe-existence and by all the possible universe-existences. Along its own coordinate, orthoexistence begets existences. Each of these unfolds against its own time but they appear as a permanence or as likely to be achieved simultaneously.

Orthoexistence cannot be said to be since ever inasmuch as time is alien to it, but it is precisely for this reason, i.e. because it appears as a permanence with respect to any existence. The world appears to be infinite if viewed from the eye of existence. Assuming a unique universe-existence, which entails a succession of such existences, this is conducive to a permanence of universe-existence with respect to the orthoexistence. The two cases actually reduce to only one. The immediate step is to recognize a multitude of universe-existences.

(Internet Document Of Indeterminate Origin)

__________________________________________________________________________________

SIMULTANEOUS QUANTUM EXISTENCE:

The view of quantum mechanics holding that a physical system simultaneously exists in all of its possible states prior to and after a measurement of the system. In the many-worlds interpretation, each of these simultaneous existences is part of a separate universe. Every time we make a measurement of a physical system and find it to be in a particular one of its possible states, our universe branches off to one of the universes in which the system is in that particular state at that moment. The system, however, continues to exist in its other possible states, in parallel universes.

(University Of Ottowa:  Internet Document)

 ___________________________________________________________________________________

 PARALLEL UNIVERSES:

 Is there a copy of you reading this article? A person who is not you but who lives on a planet called Earth, with misty mountains, fertile fields and sprawling cities, in a solar system with eight other planets? The life of this person has been identical to yours in every respect. But perhaps he or she now decides to put down this article without finishing it, while you read on.

 The idea of such an alter ego seems strange and implausible, but it looks as if we will just have to live with it, because it is supported by astronomical observations. The simplest and most popular cosmological model today predicts that you have a twin in a galaxy about 10 to the 1028 meters from here. This distance is so large that it is beyond astronomical, but that does not make your doppelgänger any less real. The estimate is derived from elementary probability and does not even assume speculative modern physics, merely that space is infinite (or at least sufficiently large) in size and almost uniformly filled with matter, as observations indicate. In infinite space, even the most unlikely events must take place somewhere. There are infinitely many other inhabited planets, including not just one but infinitely many that have people with the same appearance, name and memories as you, who play out every possible permutation of your life choices...

 (MAX TEGMARK, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN ONLINE, MAY 2003)

 ___________________________________________________________________________________

 NOW…

 What if uncertainty—the possibility that more than one course can be followed, even by caprice—allows will; will allows choice; and choice plus chaos and uncertainty determines which “existence” we are in from microsecond to microsecond?

 What if  “life,” or “existence” as we know it is a multiplicity of quantum changes—shifts between parallel existences due to choice and uncertainty-chaos-caprice—and those final destinations can be plotted with the proper influence by a superior being?

 If that is the case, then it would explain one way that God would know the end from the beginning.

 It would also explain why Satan would still be so energetically trying to involve himself in the affairs of humanity, seeking to change the ultimate “parallel existence” into one which does not include his demise…

 The Gordian Knot of prophecy seems to disallow this—but WHAT IF he still thinks he can change things?

 Is Satan seeking a friendlier quantum, parallel “Alternity” existence-string?

 Was Jesus establishing the kingdom found in the “Alternity” of prophecy, according to the will of God?

 Is Satan opposing this?

 WHAT IF?  NOW ON TO THE UNIVERSIONS PART OF THIS STUDY:

_________________________________________________________________________________

 THE BIG BANG, THE BIG CRUNCH, AND STEADY-STATE COSMOLOGIES:

 FIRST, THE “BIG BANG” THEORY IN A FEW WORDS:

 The Big Bang Theory is the dominant scientific theory about the origin of the universe. According to the big bang, the universe was created sometime between 10 billion and 20 billion years ago from a cosmic explosion that hurled matter and in all directions.

 In 1927, the Belgian priest Georges Lemaître was the first to propose that the universe began with the explosion of a primeval atom. His proposal came after observing the red shift in distant nebulas by astronomers to a model of the universe based on relativity. Years later, Edwin Hubble found experimental evidence to help justify Lemaître's theory. He found that distant galaxies in every direction are going away from us with speeds proportional to their distance.

 The big bang was initially suggested because it explains why distant galaxies are traveling away from us at great speeds. The theory also predicts the existence of cosmic background radiation (the glow left over from the explosion itself). The Big Bang Theory received its strongest confirmation when this radiation was discovered in 1964 by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, who later won the Nobel Prize for this discovery.

 Although the Big Bang Theory is widely accepted, it probably will never be proved; consequentially, leaving a number of tough, unanswered questions.

 (NASA, Updated December 2, 1997)

 NOW, THE “BIG CRUNCH” THEORY IN A FEW WORDS:

 The universe's fate is intimately connected to its shape which, in turn, depends on a single number, Omega: the ratio of the average mass density of the universe to the critical value required to just maintain equilibrium.
 

An open universe, corresponding to omega less than one, will expand forever. Matter will spread thinner and thinner. Galaxies will exhaust their gas supply for forming new stars, and old stars will eventually burn out, leaving only dust and dead stars. The universe will become quite dark and, as the temperature of the universe will approaches absolute zero, quite cold. The universe will not end, exactly, just peter out in a Big Chill.

 The expansion of a closed universe, with an Omega greater than one, will slow down until it reaches a maximum size, when it begins its inward collapse. Like a video of the Big Bang and expansion run backward, the universe will become denser and hotter until it ends in an infinitely hot, infinitely dense Big Crunch--perhaps providing the seed for another Big Bang.

 If Omega equals 1 exactly, then cosmic expansion will coast to a halt infinitely far into the future. The universe will not end in a Big Crunch nor expand into an infinite Big Chill, but will remain at equilibrium.

 This last case is consistent with the inflation hypothesis, and also commands the most observational support.

 Not to mention the fact that, for most of us, it's an emotionally appealing scenario. Even though the universe's fate lies billions of years in the future, it's the only one we have.

 (Copyright, (c) 1995: Board of Trustees, University of Illinois)

 LASTLY, STEADY-STATE THEORY:

 An alternative theory to the Big Bang was proposed in 1948 by Hermann Bondi, Thomas Gold, and Sir Fred Hoyle It was called the steady-state theory. They found the idea of a sudden beginning to the universe philosophically unsatisfactory. Bondi and Gold suggested that in order to understand the universe we needed to make observations of its distant parts, which would of necessity be observations from the past. In order to interpret those observations we must use the laws of physics, and those have been formulated at the present time. If the state of the universe was different in the past how could we be sure that the laws of physics were not different in the past as well? If they were different no valid conclusions could be drawn. For Bondi and Gold not only would the laws of physics have to be the same in all parts of the universe, but at all times as well. The Universe would also be the same, always static, always contracting or always expanding. The first two could be ruled 0ut by the simple observation that the sky is dark at night. (see Olber's Paradox)

 Hoyle approached the problem mathematically and tried to solve the problem of the creation of the matter seen all around us, which in the Big Bang theory is all created at the start. He proposed that the decrease in the density of the universe caused by its expansion is exactly balanced by the continuous creation of matter condensing into galaxies that take the place of the galaxies that have receded from the Milky Way, thereby maintaining forever the present appearance of the universe. In order to produce the matter, a reservoir of energy would be required. In order to prevent this reservoir being diluted, by the creation of matter and by the expansion of the universe, he made this reservoir negative. The expansion and creation now work against each other and a steady state of energy is maintained.

 The steady state theorists explained the hydrogen - helium abundance by the presence of supernovae. Originally the big bang theory suggested that all the heavy elements were produced at the start of the universe, but now it is accepted that only the helium and a little lithium was produced then and both theories now accept the role of supernovae in the creation of heavy elements.

 One important and little known attribute of the steady state theory is its importance to an aspect of electromagnetic and quantum theory. Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism have two solutions, one positive, one negative. Consider the equation x2 = 4. It has two solutions; x = 2 and x = -2. In Maxwell's equations the negative solution was usually discarded, as it would correspond to something traveling backwards in time. However, in 1941 John Wheeler and Richard Feynman, proposed that by taking seriously the idea that two waves, one traveling forward in time and one traveling backwards, were produced in electromagnetic interactions certain problems in quantum theory disappeared. Between the cause and effect in an experiment the two waves add together, but before the cause, and after the effect, the two waves cancel, so what we see is the sequence; cause, interaction, effect. The crucial aspect for cosmology in the Wheeler - Feynman theory is that the two waves only cancel outside the event if they are both of equal size, in other words the wave from the future has to be the same size as the wave from the past, and this implies that the universe is the same in the future as it was in the past and hence in a steady state.

 Steady state is not without problems though, there are several areas in which it is in difficulty. One is the distribution of radio sources. For any sources if the distribution is uniform the fainter ones will be the most distant. If we draw a sphere around us corresponding to a certain brightness then the number of such sources will be proportional to the surface area of that sphere, and thus proportional to radius squared. The number of sources brighter than that certain brightness should be proportional to the volume of that sphere, and hence radius cubed, as they will all lie within the sphere. A graph of the log of the number of sources at a particular brightness, to the log of the number of sources brighter than that brightness, should have a gradient of 1.5 (=3/2) For radio sources the ratio is 1.8 showing that there are more bright radio sources at greater distance, and hence earlier times than would be expected for a steady state universe. The conclusion is that the universe is evolving or at least changing.

 The discovery of quasars in 1966, also provided evidence contradicting the steady-state theory. Quasars are very small but brilliantly luminous extragalactic systems, found only at great distances. Their light has taken several billion years to reach the earth. Quasars are therefore objects from the remote past, which indicates that a few billion years ago the constitution of the universe was very different than it is today.

 The steady-state theory is now no longer accepted by most cosmologists, particularly after the discovery of microwave background radiation in 1965, for which steady state has no explanation.

 The Hubble Deep Field photograph taken in 1996 by the Hubble Space Telescope shows the most distant view known. It was expected to show the birth of galaxies, but instead shows galaxies looking remarkably like present day ones, perhaps there is life in the steady state yet.

 (The Schools' Observatory)

 ___________________________________________________________________________________

 NOW:

 What if this is a “Universion?”

 What is what we see described in Genesis 1:1 is the LATEST in a series of  “Big-Bang, Big-Crunch” cycles?

 If it is—and with quantum realities and parallel universe theory being what it seems to be—what if we just didn’t get it right the times before; what if He just started over?

 Here is an illustration which would show how the cycle would look:

 WHAT IF?

 The important thing is that we get it right this time!

 ALSO:  Quantum Christianity postulates—from the studies found in Theoretical Christianity that this ministry has established—that through the use of Theoretical Physics, White Hole-Black Hole Physics, postulated Worm-Hole Physics, and the attendant Schwartzkild diagrams which show how—potentially—matter entered this universe in a “big Bang—“ 

 --the rectification of the Steady-State and Big-Bang cosmological arguments!

 It is quite simple, really:  if God created everything from His own Cosmic, Shekinah Essence (Power), then it was used for the primordial energy from which the matter in this universe was born.  Instead of E = mc² (implying a constant speed of light and an indefinite source of energy) rendering itself through transposition to m = E/c²—it would be the following equation:

 P = ml²,  where instead of E (energy), the variable would be P (cosmic power, or shekinah), m still equaling mass or matter, and “l” meaning “lux mutare”³ (from the Latin “variable light)—implying a non-constant speed of light throughout the ages.

 This relationship would transpose itself into m = P/l²—accounting for the primordial mass of the universe from the essential cosmic force of God Himself, literally giving part of Himself into creation.⁴

 THEREFORE:  HE WAS THERE BEFORE THE “BIG BANG,” WHICH WAS PART OF THE CREATION PROCESS OF THE PROTOVERSE WE NOW OCCUPY; AND HE WILL BE THERE AFTER IT IS GONE.

 HENCE:  THERE IS STEADY-STATE AND “BIG BANG” COSMOLOGY FOUND IN THE BIBLE!

 He says, “From everlasting to everlasting, I AM; (Steady-State)

 He says, “Tell them I AM sent you…”  (I AM; persistence throughout time and space; Steady-State)

 He says, “I am the ALPHA and the OMEGA, the beginning and the ending…” (Big-Bang – Big-Crunch)

 And of course, Genesis 1:1:  “In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth (Big-Bang – Big-Crunch)

 The last step in the preparation for Quantum Christianity is to understand the illustrations in the Bible which indicate “quantum” or parallel results created by choice, obedience, and the test of character we are in:

 _________________________________________________________________________________

 THE DAY AND HOUR OF THE SECOND COMING OF THE SON OF MAN:

 THE TEMPTING OF EVE IN THE GARDEN:

 THE TEMPTING OF JESUS IN THE WILDERNESS:

 PRAYER AS A QUANTUM EVENT:

 THE TIME OF THE RAPTURE—AND THE NATURE OF THE TRANSLATION:

 THE CHOICE OF NOAH

 THE CHOICE OF ABRAM

 THE CHOICE OF MARY

 THE CHOICES OF THE DISCIPLES

 THE CHOICE OF PAUL

 THE GREAT COMMISSION

 THERE ARE MANY OTHER EXAMPLES:  NOW COMES THE WORK OF PROOFS AND FINALIZATION…

__________________________________________________________________________

LEXICON:

Theosynthesis¹  is a PARRC Research empirical research tool which seeks to either render two disparate concepts back into the original pristine state, or render one concept back into two separate pristine states.  This rendering apart of one concept back into two is called Theofission as a part of Theosynthesis

Theofusion²  is the first example; two things back into one, containing the pristine meanings and values

Lux Mutare³ is a PARRC Research nomenclature for the principle involving the variable which is normally represented by c in the Einsteinian equation—but represents a variable speed of light, not constant

⁴Please refer to the PARRC website at www.parrc.org for additional information on Theoretical Christianity and the above-referenced Schwartzkild diagram of the White-Hole/Black-Hole/Wormhole/Creation Event Horizon succession of cosmological physics which MAY account for how this universe came into existence—literally by the Power Of God.